Hybrid Monitoring of Mangroves in the Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea

Authors

  • Yongze Ding Business School, University of Hong Kong Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64391/ijssat.v1i3.002

Keywords:

mangrove monitoring, Papua New Guinea, kamiali wildlife management area, UAV LiDAR/hyperspectral, SAR and optical satellites, eDNA, passive acoustic monitoring, thermal imaging, USVs, global mangrove watch

Abstract

The Mangrove forests underpin coastal resilience, biodiversity, and livelihoods across Papua New Guinea, yet conventional monitoring in the Kamiali Wildlife Management Area (KWMA) remains sporadic and invasive. This study synthesizes evidence from a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review and evaluates a suite of complementary technologies—UAV-based multispectral/hyperspectral and LiDAR sensing, SAR and optical satellites, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), UAV thermal imaging, and uncrewed surface vessels (USVs)—to propose a hybrid monitoring framework tailored to the biophysical and social conditions of the KWMA. Across recent sources, we assess detection capacities, spatiotemporal coverage, cost efficiency, and operational feasibility under crocodile-inhabited tidal channels, dense canopies, and limited access, and we integrate outputs with global mangrove watch classifications and community priorities to inform conservation decisions and climate adaptation. The findings indicate that UAV LiDAR and hyperspectral imaging resolve canopy structure, height, and dieback at plot scales; SAR plus optical imagery enables wall-to-wall change detection across tidal regimes; eDNA reveals cryptic and rare taxa while reducing field disturbance; PAM and thermal imaging track the seasonal activity of birds, bats, and other fauna; and USVs extend water quality and geomorphological observations along hazardous channels. A cost comparison revealed that mixed sensor stacks outperform single-method approaches in terms of accuracy, repeatability, and safety when paired with streamlined field protocols. To ensure equitable practice, the framework embeds free, prior, and informed consent; data sovereignty; and coproduction with local stewards, coupled with training pathways via UN volunteers. We outline stepwise protocols for sensor selection, sampling design, QA/QC, and data fusion, culminating in decision-ready indicators aligned with reporting and sustainable development goals. The resulting roadmap is pilot-ready for KWMA and transferable to similar Pacific contexts, strengthening evidence-based governance while building local capacity. This study demonstrates how combining aerial, satellite, molecular, acoustic, thermal, and surface-vessel observations can deliver rigorous, cost-aware mangrove monitoring that advances biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, and community well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alongi, D. M. (2015). The impact of climate change on mangrove forests. Current Climate Change Reports, 1(1), 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0002-x

Aalsbersberg, B., Lokani, P., Tuiwawa, M., Waqa-Sakiti, H., & Tordoff, A. W. (2012). Ecosystem profile: East Melanesian Islands biodiversity hotspot. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. https://www.cepf.net/resources/ecosystem-profiles.

Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2022). Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis. Biological Reviews, 97(6), 2209-2236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12890

Bryan, J. E., Shearman, P. L., Aoro, G., Wavine, F., & Zerry, J. (Eds.). (2015). The current state of PNG’s forests and changes between 2002 & 2014. University of Papua New Guinea.

Bunting, P., Rosenqvist, A., Lucas, R. M., Rebelo, L. M., Hilarides, L., Thomas, N., … & Finlayson, C. M. (2022). Global mangrove extent change 1996–2020 (GMW v3). Remote Sensing, 14(15), 3657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153657

Cao, J., Liu, K., Zhuo, L., Liu, L., Zhu, Y., & Peng, L. (2021). Combining UAV-based hyperspectral and LiDAR data for mangrove species classification using the rotation forest algorithm. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 102, 102414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102414

Cao, J., Leng, W., Liu, K., Liu, L., He, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Object-Based Mangrove Species Classification Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Images and Digital Surface Models. Remote Sensing, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010089

Cutler, M. E. J., Boyd, D. S., Foody, G. M., & Vetrivel, A. (2012). Estimating tropical forest biomass with a combination of SAR image texture and Landsat TM data: An assessment of predictions between regions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 70, 66-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.03.011

Ellison, J. C. (2015). Vulnerability assessment of mangroves to climate change and sea-level rise impacts. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 23(2), 115-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9397-8

Friess, D. A., Rogers, K., Lovelock, C. E., Krauss, K. W., Hamilton, S. E., Lee, S. Y., Lucas, R., Primavera, J., Rajkaran, A., & Shi, S. (2019). The state of the world’s mangrove forests: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 89–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033302

Longenecker, K., Bolick, H., & Langston, R. (2015). Estimating sustainable live-coral harvest at Kamiali wildlife management area, Papua New Guinea. Plos one, 10(10), e0140026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140026

McCarthy, E. D., Martin, J. M., Boer, M. M., & Welbergen, J. A. (2021). Drone‐based thermal remote sensing provides an effective new tool for monitoring the abundance of roosting fruit bats. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 7(3), 461-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.202

Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R., & Mittermeier, C. G. (1997). Megadiversity: Earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. Agrupación Sierra Madre S.C.

Naputo, C. F. P., Isowa, Y., Gerona-Daga, M. E., Artigas, M. D., Kajita, T., & Salmo III, S. G. (2024). Application of eDNA metabarcoding in the assessment of fish biodiversity in Philippine mangroves: Challenges and opportunities. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 77, 103642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103642

Ou, J., Tian, Y., Zhang, Q., Xie, X., Zhang, Y., Tao, J., & Lin, J. (2023). Coupling UAV hyperspectral and LiDAR data for mangrove classification using XGBoost in China’s Pinglu Canal Estuary. Forests, 14(9), 1838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091838

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pilcher, N., & Chaloupka, M. (2013). Using community-based monitoring to estimate demographic parameters for a remote nesting population of the Critically Endangered leatherback turtle. Endangered Species Research, 20(1), 49-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00480

Qiu, P., Wang, D., Zou, X., Yang, X., Xie, G., Xu, S., & Zhong, Z. (2019). Finer resolution estimation and mapping of mangrove biomass using UAV LiDAR and WorldView-2 data. Forests, 10(10), 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100871

Rodríguez, J. P., Keith, D. A., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., Murray, N. J., Nicholson, E., Regan, T. J., ... & Wit, P. (2015). A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1662), 20140003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0003

Sotelo-Torres, F., Alvarez, L. V., & Roberts, R. C. (2023). An unmanned surface vehicle (USV): Development of an autonomous boat with a sensor integration system for bathymetric surveys. Sensors, 23(9), 4420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094420

Stat, M., John, J., DiBattista, J. D., Newman, S. J., Bunce, M., & Harvey, E. S. (2019). Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 196-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13183

Sanam, H., Thomas, A. A., Kumar, A. P., & Lakshmanan, G. (2024). Multi-sensor approach for the estimation of above-ground biomass of mangroves. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 52(4), 903-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-01811-7

Underwood, A. H., Derhé, M. A., & Jacups, S. (2022). Thermal imaging out-shines spotlighting for detecting cryptic, nocturnal mammals in tropical rainforests. Wildlife Research, 49(6), 491-499. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21130

Wee, A. K., Salmo Iii, S. G., Sivakumar, K., Then, A. Y., Basyuni, M., Fall, J., ... & Kajita, T. (2023). Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding in mangrove restoration in Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1033258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1033258

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

Issue

Section

Review Papers